Difference between revisions of "Talk:Infectious Disease Ontology"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS) | I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS) | ||
| + | |||
By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias | By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias | ||
| + | |||
How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias | How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias | ||
Revision as of 09:42, 19 September 2007
I just had a look at the ontology and I was a bit surprised that there is no sub-BFO Hierarchy. Fly, Insect and Organism are siblings which strikes me as odd. Is there a reason for this? (Mathias Brochhausen, IFOMIS)
By the way is there a chance of getting a owl file (with definitions) in order to work directly on it? Mathias
How do you define "pain". Depending on the definition I would not agree that pain is an object. Mathias